What a Brand is, What a Brand isn't: Do We Need to Draw the Line?
February 11, 2009 ‐ 0 comments

Unknown-1

 In an NPR interview last week, Obama's new Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, discussing the administration's approach to the next 4 years, mentioned the possible need to "re-brand" the No Child Left Behind act, which is ironic given that No Child Left Behind itself is a "re-branding" of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. (The actual reference to brand occurs in the audio, not the write-up).

Something about this comment caught our attention, and it wasn't just a new opportunity to ply our trade. We think it's time that we – and all communicators – think about the limits of the term 'brand'.

Wikipedia, that categorical source of truth, tells us that "a brand is a collection of symbols, experiences and associations connected with a product, a service, a person or any other artifact or entity," but let's add a layer of honesty to that definition: branding is about persuasion, and when it comes to persuasion in a competitive commercial marketplace, truth has a certain elasticity. Businesses accept it, consumers accept it, and branding professionals sure as hell capitalize on it.

We don't believe the same elasticity applies to government policy. In a world growing increasingly skeptical about marketing, talk about re-branding a vital piece of legislation undermines discussion of its substantive changes.

We admit, we've gotten caught up in brand-fever as well in our observations of the 2008 presidential campaign. But we maintain that too much focus on Obama as a brand actually detracts from his credibility.

Previously we've been dismissive of the overuse of the terms 'brand' and 'branding'. This time, we get downright prescriptive.

A brand is the image of an organization, product, or service that is meant for consumption.

There - we've put ourselves out there. No proprietary models, no 4-dimensional graphs, and only one subordinate clause. Now, on to the debate of what 'image' and 'consumption' mean...

Tell your friends:
0 Comments >>
 
 

Calling B.S.:
A Five-Part Series

BrandCulture’s thoughts on the conventional wisdom.

About BrandCulture Talk

At BrandCulture Talk, we don't stand on ceremony, celebrate conventional wisdom or honor sacred cows. Peruse cheers and jeers for the best, worst, oldest and very latest branding theory and practice...all with the assurance that every post here has passed our "Branding. Not Bull" promise. Won't you please join us and weigh in?

Subscribe to BrandCulture Talk
Twitter Feed