<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building an Authentic Brand: Walk the Talk, or Go Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandculture.com/blog/2008/05/real-deal-or-no-real-deal-building-an-authentic-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandculture.com/blog/2008/05/real-deal-or-no-real-deal-building-an-authentic-brand/</link>
	<description>Branding. Not Bull.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:45:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrandCultureTalk</title>
		<link>http://www.brandculture.com/blog/2008/05/real-deal-or-no-real-deal-building-an-authentic-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>BrandCultureTalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandculture.com/culturetalk/?p=6#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Fake rock &#039;n roll scars on new guitars do sound like they would turn off true Fender aficionados. But after 62 years, the brand might be looking outside that core for growth. It&#039;ll be interesting to see how many &quot;Road Worn&quot; guitars end up under suburban Christmas Trees (and 6 months later at the backs of suburban closets), and how vitriolic the commentary in the online forums gets...
To learn more about Fender&#039;s road worn guitars, see: http://www.fender.com/roadworn/site.php?language=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fake rock &#8216;n roll scars on new guitars do sound like they would turn off true Fender aficionados. But after 62 years, the brand might be looking outside that core for growth. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how many &#8220;Road Worn&#8221; guitars end up under suburban Christmas Trees (and 6 months later at the backs of suburban closets), and how vitriolic the commentary in the online forums gets&#8230;<br />
To learn more about Fender&#8217;s road worn guitars, see: <a href="http://www.fender.com/roadworn/site.php?language=" rel="nofollow">http://www.fender.com/roadworn/site.php?language=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.brandculture.com/blog/2008/05/real-deal-or-no-real-deal-building-an-authentic-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandculture.com/culturetalk/?p=6#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Great post. I recently started thinking a lot about authenticity when I received a flier promoting Fender&#039;s new &quot;Road Worn&quot; guitars (http://www.fender.com/roadworn/). Third parties were making money by &quot;relic-ing&quot; Fender guitars (beating them up) and reselling them, giving the purchaser something that made them look like an authentic, well-traveled rockstar. Fender decided to eliminate the middleman and start &quot;distressing&quot; their own guitars, sold under the &quot;Road Worn&quot; brand. A sensible business move, but seems like a misstep from a branding point of view. Unlike Abercrombie&#039;s beat-up jeans and hats, this struck me as an affront to Fender&#039;s core audience. Fender can credibly claim some rock authenticity (Hendrix, Clapton...pretty much every guitar great has played a Fender at some point), and this concept undercuts that legacy, in my view. I&#039;ve yet to read of any backlash, however. Curious to hear your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I recently started thinking a lot about authenticity when I received a flier promoting Fender&#8217;s new &#8220;Road Worn&#8221; guitars (<a href="http://www.fender.com/roadworn/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fender.com/roadworn/</a>). Third parties were making money by &#8220;relic-ing&#8221; Fender guitars (beating them up) and reselling them, giving the purchaser something that made them look like an authentic, well-traveled rockstar. Fender decided to eliminate the middleman and start &#8220;distressing&#8221; their own guitars, sold under the &#8220;Road Worn&#8221; brand. A sensible business move, but seems like a misstep from a branding point of view. Unlike Abercrombie&#8217;s beat-up jeans and hats, this struck me as an affront to Fender&#8217;s core audience. Fender can credibly claim some rock authenticity (Hendrix, Clapton&#8230;pretty much every guitar great has played a Fender at some point), and this concept undercuts that legacy, in my view. I&#8217;ve yet to read of any backlash, however. Curious to hear your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meloni Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.brandculture.com/blog/2008/05/real-deal-or-no-real-deal-building-an-authentic-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Meloni Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandculture.com/culturetalk/?p=6#comment-363</guid>
		<description>This a a wonderful marketing site.  The last paragraph of the Building an Authentic Brand is the perfect summary for my new book.  I will share your site in my book!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This a a wonderful marketing site.  The last paragraph of the Building an Authentic Brand is the perfect summary for my new book.  I will share your site in my book!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marsha Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.brandculture.com/blog/2008/05/real-deal-or-no-real-deal-building-an-authentic-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Marsha Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandculture.com/culturetalk/?p=6#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Very true.  Made me want to have a brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true.  Made me want to have a brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
